Three texts are published on the Publications page by way of prolonging the introductory meeting.
The first is a written introduction to the contemporary situation and to the future of metaphysics and ontology – lacking an eloquent title – “Metaphysics Today and Tomorrow”. It is an extension of the lecture from the first meeting, but it only partially ties into the lecture, and develops certain questions in much more detail. The text constitutes a synthesis of several important works and articles that have been published in French, in English, and in Italian on the subject over the past decade.
The second publication is the French translation (not for sale) of a text by the American metaphysician Dean Zimmerman, entitled “La métaphysique après le vingtième siècle” (“Metaphysics after the Twentieth Century”), which is principally devoted to the future prospects of metaphysics on the brink of the twenty-first century, while posing the question of the “analytic-continental schism” anew. Dean Zimmerman had the kindness to accept Raphaël Millière’s translating and publishing the text in French, and had reread the results of this work.
Lastly, the site contains a excerpt from the proceedings of the colloquium at Cérisy-la-Salle in 1958, published in the Cahiers de Royaumont in 1962. The text is referred to in “Metaphysics Today and Tomorrow”, and Raphaël Millière had decided that it would be interesting to make an extract of the proceedings available. This colloquium constituted one of the main encounters between “analytic” and “continental” philosophers – these terms having been invented here by Jean Wahl – and made possible discussions between, on the one side, Ryle, Strawson, Quine and Austin, and, on the other side, Alquié, Merleau-Ponty, Wahl and Van Breda. The extract that I have translated corresponds to the “dialogue of the deaf” between Strawson, Van Breda and Wahl that is evoked in “Metaphysics Today and Tomorrow”. It is both amusing for those interested in analytic philosophy, and symptomatic of the incomprehension which still often reigns in the attempts at “dialogue” between the two traditions.
The workshop will continue its activities as planned with two meetings devoted to necessity and to possibility, which will begin this Friday in the seminar room of the pavillon Pasteur, with an intervention by Michele Salimbeni on David Lewis’ modal realism.
[Originally published 12 October 2011. Translated by Mark Ohm.]
[Translator’s note: A translation of the excerpted discussion from Cérisy-la-Salle will soon be added.]